Klopp: I would have paid to lead Man City by four points

first_imgJurgen Klopp says he “would have paid money” to be four points clear of Manchester City in the Premier League after two games against the champions this season.City ran out 2-1 winners in their meeting at the Etihad Stadium on Thursday, moving them back to within four points of the leaders and inflicting a league defeat on the Reds for the first time this season.Defeat saw Liverpool ultimately pass up the chance to go 10 clear of City, something that, in the eyes of many, would have effectively ended the hosts’ title hopes. Article continues below Editors’ Picks ‘There is no creativity’ – Can Solskjaer get Man Utd scoring freely again? ‘Everyone legged it on to the pitch!’ – How Foden went from Man City superfan to future superstar Emery out of jail – for now – as brilliant Pepe papers over Arsenal’s cracks What is Manchester United’s ownership situation and how would Kevin Glazer’s sale of shares affect the club? As it was, Leroy Sane’s 72nd-minute winner blew the title race open once again, as the German clinched victory after Roberto Firmino had cancelled out Sergio Aguero’s emphatic opener.Nevertheless, Klopp did not want to focus on the negative, adamant he never thought it possible to be clear of City after playing their two regulated Premier League fixtures.”If someone had told me after both games against Man City that we were four points clear, I would have paid money for it, you cannot believe,” Klopp told reporters.”We are still in a pretty good position so it’s all fine for us. Not in the moment, it feels really bad, but it’s only the moment.”Time to regroup, move on and prepare for the next game. Up the Reds.#WeAreLiverpool pic.twitter.com/TyCTPX7Fcr— Liverpool FC (@LFC) January 3, 2019″I didn’t think it would be possible. Football is like this. If we win this [match] and are 10 points ahead and from that point win no games, then nothing happens. It’s really important we take it game by game.”If we would have won the title five times in the last 10 years, we would say; ‘100 percent [we’ll win it]’. But we don’t have experience in it, so why act like someone who wins all the time?”We never won it as a team so we want to finish the season as good as possible, and that’s alright, we can, we’re still in a good position.”It is all fine for us. Not in the moment, it feels really bad, but it is only a moment. Then we have an opportunity to work on it.”Liverpool looked sharper in midfielder after Fabinho had replaced James Milner in the 57th minute, though Klopp did not feel the Brazilian suited the system he wanted to start the match with.”System wise it wasn’t a real alternative in the beginning and we adapted well after we changed, only because Gini [Georginio Wijnaldum] played really well on the left wing, or half left wing, if you like,” Klopp said.”Hendo [Jordan Henderson] was really impressive, and offensively I think we already had more moments [than City] in the game [before Fabinho came on], that’s what we showed the boys at half-time.”Immediately [after half-time] we were a major threat for them. We came through, passed through, the chance of Sadio [Mane] was great.”There were others moments when we took the ball and accelerated, not immediately passing, because if you can outplay the counter-press every team in the world struggles, even City.”We had these moments and sometimes the cross wasn’t good enough, or the pass – that happens. It’s not about two players [Fabinho and Milner].”You have to constantly work for momentum. That was the game today. There were a lot of really wild moments, a lot of rusty moments. It was really intense for both teams – they won, we lost, that’s how it is sometimes.” Subscribe to Goal’s Liverpool Correspondent Neil Jones’ weekly email bringing you the best Liverpool FC writing from around the weblast_img read more

Read More

Canadas navy is developing an AI voice assistant for warships but dont

The Canadian Forces is experimenting with a voice assistant that could be used on the bridge of combat vessels, but don’t expect to hear “Hey Siri, fire the guns!” aboard a warship anytime soon.Under development in partnership with IBM and Lockheed Martin, the “Boatswain’s Mate” virtual bridge assistant is intended to function in essentially the same way as Apple Inc.’s Siri or Amazon.com Inc.’s Alexa, taking voice commands and then carrying out tasks in response.Rear Admiral Casper Donovan, the director general of future ship capability for the Royal Canadian Navy, said the navy has been working on the idea for more than a year, but that they’re still at least another year away from conducting tests aboard a warship.Donovan framed the project as an attempt to use artificial intelligence technology to improve the efficiency of a ship’s sailors. Killer robots aren’t just science fiction anymore Canada risks losing its artificial intelligence edge as adoption lags and the tech goes mainstream Ethics needs to keep up with economics when it comes to AI, experts warn For example, if a navy vessel is expecting a helicopter to land on the ship, the captain would normally give the order to prepare for landing to a sailor who would then relay the instruction throughout the ship.The Boatswain’s Mate voice assistant is being designed to replace the sailor who would normally receive those verbal instructions, instead relaying the commands through the ship’s onboard computer system.“A lot of that today is done with a commanding officer asking a boatswain’s mate to do this, then that boatswain’s mate has to understand the approach, then pipe the command, then write it on a piece of paper and audit everything,” said Charbel Safadi, AI leader for IBM Canada.Safadi said running these commands through a computer system instead creates a data log that can be audited later, and it frees up a sailor who would otherwise be responsible for relaying instructions from the commanding officer.While the Boatswain’s Mate is being designed for the bridge of a warship, potentially for use in actual combat situations, the intent is more similar to a private business trying to reduce the need for workers through the use of new technology.But the project comes at a time when militaries around the world are figuring out how best to deploy AI technologies while navigating the thorny ethical issues that come with them.In particular, Donovan said the navy is being careful to steer clear of the dilemmas raised by the potential of linking AI with lethal weapons systems.“We haven’t explicitly told ourselves we have a red line, but there is clearly a red line, that we’re not pursuing any AI that is connected to employing weapon systems,” Donovan said.“Our systems, especially our weapons systems, are under a chain of command and that chain of command is on people, and people are employing those systems.”But depending on how broadly you define “artificial intelligence,” the technology is probably already finding its way into Canadian weapons systems, according to Warren Shiau, who focuses on artificial intelligence as research vice-president with IDC Canada.“Artificial intelligence” is a bit of a loose catch-all term for many different technologies that use machine learning software to improve technology.Voice assistants rely on AI to do speech recognition, but deep learning can also be embedded in anything from video games to human resources software to improve outcomes.Shiau said AI is also being embedded in lots of military systems, too.“Of course people are integrating into weapons systems, simply because it can help so much, on things like target identification, target acquisition or better calculation of flight paths and stuff like that for, say, cruise missiles,” he said.“It’s not the Canadian government directly supporting it. It’s more that it comes in a weapons system and we could be buying that system.”Shiau noted that like most big companies, militaries around the world are also looking at artificial intelligence tools to help them operate more efficiently and use fewer people to perform bureaucratic and administrative functions.“Armed forces, they’re facing a severe manpower shortage,” he said.“An armed forces can’t work without all the background logistics and administration. So if all your personnel need to be devoted to operational capability, who’s actually taking care of the shop?”• Email: [email protected] | Twitter: read more

Read More

Eliminating brake dust particle emissions

first_imgAdvanced Braking Technology (ABT) manufactures the “safer vehicle braking system”, the multi-award winning SIBS® (Sealed Integrated Braking System). SIBS failsafe brakes are widely used in light commercial vehicles for the mining industry, operating in some of the harshest conditions in the world. The SIBS system is a single rotor, enclosed, wet braking system which reduces brake operating temperatures, reduces wear and, ABT claims, “totally eliminates the generation of fine dust particle emissions.“Environmentally friendly SIBS brakes provide unparalleled safety, increased productivity and are highly adaptable.”last_img read more

Read More